|Solicitors from Hell||
Solicitors from Hell
These two are the biggest 'Dog Turds'
anywhere on the Internet they 'Blabbermouth' their heads off making defamatory
comments about my website all over the World Wide Web and also these two
'Dipshits' have been 'Blabber mouthing' on their website false defamatory
accusations about my website, also accusing me of 'Extortion' for close
on 10yrs and saying...
Johnathan Fagan as written some concoction of a story I believe giving the impression this is part of or on my website I think my only comment is to quote what Mr Justice Tagenhat said in Court... "...should take reasonable care in relation to the publication", also Mr Vassal-Adams QC who said "...appeared to be willing to publish very serious defamatory allegations without any prior check to establish their truth and accuracy".
These 'Pillacks' don't appear to have anything between their ears... and it's doubtful if they have anything between their legs either, if they have, it's probably a fanny...
Solicitors from Hell - a genuine customer
He asked many personal questions that were not actually relevant to the case in question and gave out information about what he had allegedly done to help other clients. He kept going on about her being a young vulnerable woman and stated that he was going to take several actions on her behalf as she was being harassed by the landlord.
However as my cousin felt uncomfortable seeing him alone she asked me to come to the next meeting. When he saw that she was accompanied by a male family member, he was abrupt and tried to give the impression that he had not really wanted to take her on as a client in the first instance. He stated that she did not need the help of a solicitor however this had not stopped him from applying for and receiving the legal aid to progress her case.
He wrote a long letter of summery allegedly to explain why she did not need his help - which was actually more like a personal tirade against his own client and told her to make a complaint if she felt she had the strength! It was then difficult to find another solicitor to transfer the LSF to; luckily the solicitor my cousin then found was extremely professional, helpful and progressed a speedy resolution on her behalf.
Only use this firm if you want to be disappointed and put under stress. Not to be trusted!! "
I am not quite sure what the complainant's complaint is having read it through a few times - is it that the solicitor was not only from hell but also a bit of a creep? Was the solicitor trying to defraud the LSC? Does this feedback assist anyone in deciding whether to hire this firm of solicitors or not?
The service obviously provides a genuine service when you get a firm like SMK Solicitors, who are now shut down due to a range of problems and have been intervened. A site with feedback detailing the potential fraud that a client experienced would be helpful for anyone else to know to avoid it.
However read the feedback on a law firm in the South West:
"I worked at X (thankfully not for long). A good example of the way the firm operates is when I was told to create as much conflict as possible in child contact cases in order to maximise costs. This firm definitely needs some intervention from the Law Society. The Senior Partners are a joke and would not survive in a modern law firm. It is true, they are fascist bullies. Oh, and where I work now, I am allowed to make myself a cup of coffee! "
This sort of entry could be put down to a former employee airing a grievance and trying to get one over on the firm. They have certainly done this. The firm in question obviously now have anyone thinking of instructing them and reading this that the staff do not like working there, the firm is bent, the partners not very nice. It could damage that firm's reputation forever. I certainly had no idea that the firm were thought of in this way, and we introduced one of the partners mentioned to the firm many years ago!
I understand that unless a law firm pays an "administration fee" of £200 then the entry remains on the site for eternity. This means that anyone searching for the law firm will inevitably come across comments like this one.
Think of the black hat marketing potential of this site. Any law firm in Swindon for example could post anonymous comments onto the site for their competitors and sit back and watch their instructions increase. Obviously this comment is intended as irony....(before we get sued!).
So in summary I am afraid we think that the site is b**ll**ks. There has been no effort to identify the posters, and this makes the site positively evil as it could unfairly irreparably damage someone's reputation who does not deserve it.
I hope the owner of the site sees some sense or gets tired of receiving writs in the post and takes it down or identifies each complainant. I think that without any control this site is simply destroying law firms very unfairly indeed.
Jonathan Fagan - Ten-Percent Legal Recruitment -
If I hear from any of these Dog Turds it will be published here.