Solicitors from Hell

Legal Recruitment Blog

Solicitors from Hell
Long Vocation
Mad Dog Des
King John
Adam the Ant LSO
Queen Bee
Des & King John

Thursday, September 30, 2010

Solicitors from Hell - a genuine customer service, a scam or absolute b**ll**ks?

http://www.solicitorsfromhell.com/ is a new consumer website that has attracted the attention of the Law Society Gazette and numerous solicitors firms who have had the pleasure of an entry on it. There appear to be over 500 law firms listed on it, and as far as I could see most of the complaints were not really complaints but fairly damaging comments...

I recently came across it when looking for a firm of solicitor's contact details and discovered the second entry in Google was this site. The review of the firm read as follows: ...
Click HERE

LEGAL LAW - London SW
London SWI

I understand that unless a law firm pays an "administration fee" of £200 then the entry remains on the site for eternity. This means that anyone searching for the law firm will inevitably come across comments like this one.

Think of the black hat marketing potential of this site. Any law firm in Swindon for example could post anonymous comments onto the site for their competitors and sit back and watch their instructions increase. Obviously this comment is intended as irony....(before we get sued!).

So in summary I am afraid we think that the site is b**ll**ks. There has been no effort to identify the posters, and this makes the site positively evil as it could unfairly irreparably damage someone's reputation who does not deserve it. . Johnathan Fagan 30/9/2010

These two are the biggest 'Dog Turds' anywhere on the Internet they 'Blabbermouth' their heads off making defamatory comments about my website all over the World Wide Web and also these two 'Dipshits' have been 'Blabber mouthing' on their website false defamatory accusations about my website, also accusing me of 'Extortion' for close on 10yrs and saying...
. "I am afraid we think that the site is b**ll**ks"

Johnathan Fagan as written some concoction of a story I believe giving the impression this is part of or on my website…I think my only comment is to quote what Mr Justice Tagenhat said in Court... "...should take reasonable care in relation to the publication", also Mr Vassal-Adams QC who said "...appeared to be willing to publish very serious defamatory allegations without any prior check to establish their truth and accuracy".

These 'Pillacks' don't appear to have anything between their ears... and it's doubtful if they have anything between their legs either, if they have, it's probably a fanny...

Solicitors from Hell - a genuine customer service,
a scam or absolute b**ll**ks?

"http://www.solicitorsfromhell.com".
Unfortunately we have only just heard about this site, had we had a chance to do a check on him prior it would have saved a great deal of upset and stress. My female cousin went to see this ‘solicitor’ with housing problems. At the initial consultation he was extremely friendly – actually overly so when his secretary went out of the room.

He asked many personal questions that were not actually relevant to the case in question and gave out information about what he had allegedly done to help other clients. He kept going on about her being a young vulnerable woman and stated that he was going to take several actions on her behalf as she was being harassed by the landlord.

However as my cousin felt uncomfortable seeing him alone she asked me to come to the next meeting. When he saw that she was accompanied by a male family member, he was abrupt and tried to give the impression that he had not really wanted to take her on as a client in the first instance. He stated that she did not need the help of a solicitor – however this had not stopped him from applying for and receiving the legal aid to progress her case.

He wrote a long letter of summery allegedly to explain ‘why’ she did not need his help - which was actually more like a personal tirade against his own client and told her to make a complaint if she felt she had the strength! It was then difficult to find another solicitor to transfer the LSF to; luckily the solicitor my cousin then found was extremely professional, helpful and progressed a speedy resolution on her behalf.

Only use this firm if you want to be disappointed and put under stress. Not to be trusted!! "

I am not quite sure what the complainant's complaint is having read it through a few times - is it that the solicitor was not only from hell but also a bit of a creep? Was the solicitor trying to defraud the LSC? Does this feedback assist anyone in deciding whether to hire this firm of solicitors or not?

The service obviously provides a genuine service when you get a firm like SMK Solicitors, who are now shut down due to a range of problems and have been intervened. A site with feedback detailing the potential fraud that a client experienced would be helpful for anyone else to know to avoid it.

However read the feedback on a law firm in the South West:

"I worked at X (thankfully not for long). A good example of the way the firm operates is when I was told to create as much conflict as possible in child contact cases in order to maximise costs. This firm definitely needs some intervention from the Law Society. The Senior Partners are a joke and would not survive in a modern law firm. It is true, they are fascist bullies. Oh, and where I work now, I am allowed to make myself a cup of coffee! "

This sort of entry could be put down to a former employee airing a grievance and trying to get one over on the firm. They have certainly done this. The firm in question obviously now have anyone thinking of instructing them and reading this that the staff do not like working there, the firm is bent, the partners not very nice. It could damage that firm's reputation forever. I certainly had no idea that the firm were thought of in this way, and we introduced one of the partners mentioned to the firm many years ago!

I understand that unless a law firm pays an "administration fee" of £200 then the entry remains on the site for eternity. This means that anyone searching for the law firm will inevitably come across comments like this one.

Think of the black hat marketing potential of this site. Any law firm in Swindon for example could post anonymous comments onto the site for their competitors and sit back and watch their instructions increase. Obviously this comment is intended as irony....(before we get sued!).

So in summary I am afraid we think that the site is b**ll**ks. There has been no effort to identify the posters, and this makes the site positively evil as it could unfairly irreparably damage someone's reputation who does not deserve it.

I hope the owner of the site sees some sense or gets tired of receiving writs in the post and takes it down or identifies each complainant. I think that without any control this site is simply destroying law firms very unfairly indeed.

Jonathan Fagan - Ten-Percent Legal Recruitment -
www.ten-percent.co.uk


Jonathan Fagan . . , , . . Clare Fagan . . . . . Peter Gresty

These are the 'Dog Turds' that own and run this 'absolute b**ll**ks' of a website "Legal Recruitment Blog" and between them they don't have an ounce of 'Grey Matter' between them…

Fagan, it appears he claims he found my website which he claims "I recently came across it when looking for a firm of solicitor's contact details and discovered the second entry in Google was this site.

Fagan states "My female cousin went to see this 'solicitor' with housing problems. At the initial consultation he was extremely friendly - actually overly so when his secretary went out of the room. He asked many personal questions that were not actually relevant to the case in question and gave out information about what he had allegedly done to help other clients. He kept going on about her being a young vulnerable woman and stated that he was going to take several actions on her behalf as she was being harassed by the landlord.

However as my cousin felt uncomfortable seeing him alone she asked me (Fagan) to come to the next meeting. When he saw that she was accompanied by a male family member, he was abrupt and tried to give the impression that he had not really wanted to take her on as a client in the first instance. He stated that she did not need the help of a solicitor - however this had not stopped him from applying for and receiving the legal aid to progress her case.

He wrote a long letter of summery allegedly to explain 'why' she did not need his help - which was actually more like a personal tirade against his own client and told her to make a complaint if she felt she had the strength! It was then difficult to find another solicitor to transfer the LSF to; luckily the solicitor my cousin then found was extremely professional, helpful and progressed a speedy resolution on her behalf."

Fagan's opinion of this Solicitors "Only use this firm if you want to be disappointed and put under stress. Not to be trusted!!"

This 'Dog Turd Fagan' has first-hand experience of this case for he explains "My female cousin" he is on about and he is saying there are some 500 similar stories on my website, I would like him to point out just where they are.

These 'Dog Turds' above are making-up stories as they go so how can anyone believe the shit on their Legal Recruitment Blog, if they do they must be the most stupid humans to ever have walked on Planet Earth…

Oh, talking of a 'Scam' which these 'Dog Turds' say my website is, have you seen the prices that they charge to train/advise these qualified solicitors with degrees how to write their CV's and to conduct their interviews. These people who take-up their offer must be the doziest and easiest people to con.

If I hear from any of these Dog Turds it will be published here.