Attorney Carolyn Elefant"
------- How thick can an American Lawyer
Just over two months later on April 4, I sent Carolyn Elefant a email and the first line stated "I am the owner of "Solicitors from Hell.com and it has come to my attention..." and signed it Brian R Gray. She is now aware of both websites and their prospective owners/Authors names. The email of April 4, made it clear she was making false allegations against me and my website (Brian Gray - Solicitors From Hell.Com).
On April 8, Ms Elefant sent me an email and I understand after four days of investigation with clear details in the Gazette and my email this 'internet wise' Attorney could not identify "co.uk" from ".com" or tell the difference between Rick Kordowski and Brian Gray.- I wrote a second email to Ms Elefant on April 9, telling her in no uncertain terms she was making false accusations and in the first paragraph made clear my name once more, which she already knew from previous email exchanges, but this was all to no avail as she could not see the problem.
Around April 24, Attorney Chuck Newton informed Ms Elefant about her horrendous mistake and what did she say in her 'Post Removal' "Despite the emails from Gray, I couldn't figure out my error..."- Now come on this is a US Attorney who is telling the www "I was a lawyer ahead of schedule..." and she comes up with the excuse "I was confused".- How the hell does she get any clients and for them to have any faith in her when she can't tell her arse from her elbow? - I'll give her a 'Clue'!
"I did not realize that I had made a mistake so I was loathe to apologize"
Doesn't that say it all?- Did anyone hear the apology????
think it appropriate to add a comment from Ms Elefant's 'Myshingle.Com'
Anne - April 27, 2010 11:03 AM
Carolyn you have set yourself up as Judge, Jury and 'executioner' and when the accused protested his innocents you ignored his plea and insisted your punishment must stand (your www public humiliation). The "Manga Carta" signed by King John at Runnymede on the 15 June 1215 (No freeman shall be taken, or imprisoned, or disseized, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any way harmed--nor will we go upon or send upon him--save by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land) and was included in the United States Constitution, how come you have more powers than this ancient document and the United States Constitution?