Zahida
"Queen
Rat" Manzoor
The
Legal Services Ombudsman
Part
1
--- Part
2 --- Part
3 --- Part
4
When
you take your complaint to the Legal Ombudsman you are sent a 'little
blue book' entitled "The Legal Services Ombudsman explained".
So you read this 'little blue book' and note that it states, amongst
many things, "They
(ref. to the OSS) should carry out
a detailed, unbiased investigation, within a reasonable time. They
must take into consideration the views of everyone involved, and then
make a reasonable decision based on all the available information".
"involved" in my case was a District Judge who
'rebuked' my Solicitor for taking 'five years too long', a Barrister
who labelled Thos Boyd Whyte's Solicitors 'negligent' and 'incompetent',
Ann Abraham (ex-Legal Ombudsman) who used the words "…their
work was so bad…". The
third Solicitor on my case wrote
in an 'attendance note' that she didn't think I had been treated correctly
and Gordon Luckhurst the Senior Partner stated in a letter to the
OSS that he had not handle my complaints properly. In my own
case I made "available information"
that showed TBW were 'deceitful', 'dishonest' and told numerous 'lies'.
Thos Boyd Whyte refused to comply with the 'Client Care Agreement'
that comes under Solicitors rule 15 in that on two occasions the Senior
Partner refused to see me, plus he did not turn up for a previously
prearranged meeting, and discuss my 'dissatisfaction' on how they
had handled and were handling my affairs, when it came to the 'Office
for the Supervision of Solicitors' investigating my complaint it sounded
like the 'three wise monkeys', "Hear
no evil, see no evil, say no evil".
Now
we move on to the Ombudsman 'little blue book' that goes on to state
"She will always look at what you have
to say and, if she can't help, she will tell you why"
also "What the Ombudsman will do is
check that all your complaints were addressed and that this was done
within a reasonable time", the point here is, do you
believe in fairies? If you do then the chances are you will probably
believe the load of crap in the Ombudsman's 'little blue book'. In
my case she must be 'blind, deaf and dumb"
for she didn't 'see', 'hear' or 'address'
my complaints.
Has
Zahida Manzoor got all her marbles?
If
you read an article by Zahida Manzoor she describes a case that
happened to a woman identical to what happened to me as "Ludicrous
and things have got to change"
unfortunately I happen to be 'White
and a Male', in the past she campaigned for race and
sexual equality so what she said, in her opinion, would not apply
to me. Oh yes, we all thought the Legal Service Ombudsman was supposed
to be neutral with no axes to grind? Well that's what her number
one fan tells me, then again we are all 'Right
Charlie's' at times.
If
you read an article in 'The Mail on Sunday'
dated 18 January 2004 you will see a 'Fireman missed out
on a job ...just because he was 'White and
a Male'. "A FIRE chief has been found guilty of hiring
unfit and unqualified firefighters to meet Government
targets for women and ethnic minorities" In Zahida
Manzoor's case is it likely the standard was lowered twice, once
because she is a woman and again because she is a member of an ethnic
minority?
Why
did the Lord Chancellor make her the LSO?
I
don't think that takes a lot to work out. First and foremost is
so that no one can turn round and wave that magic 'racist flag'
regardless of how she treats appeals to her department. You would
think after the Kamlesh Bahl
affair 'Charlie' would realise these people turn round and bite
you then come back again and sting
you. 'Charlie' should stop making hypercritical rubbish speeches
and take to reading what 'Enoch' had to say. Oh yes, don't let
us forget 'Charlie' is going to appoint Zahida Manzoor as the
new Legal Services Complaints Commissioner (LSCC) she asked 'Dickie'
who was the Marquis of Queensberry, but he didn't know either.
With Lord 'Charlie' in Zahida's corner there is no way the Law
Society will lose any fight because their 'Protection Racket'
is foolproof.