Newton tells me he's a good friend of Solo Attorney Carolyn Elefant
probably why he did not publish my comments on his 'Blog'
After Attorney Carolyn Elefant, a good friend of Chuck's which I didn't know at the time, published lies and defamatory content on her Myshingles.com Blog I decided to post a comment on an American 'Blog' which happened to be another 'Solo' Attorney Chuck Newton's website. It seems all American Lawyers have these 'Blogs,' especially the 'Solos', but unless you are prepared to do some 'Arse Licking', and it appears there is a lot of that going on between these 'Solos', then you cannot get past 'First Base'.
First I have put the comment as I wrote it to Chuck's Blog but just like Carolyn Elefant he appears to suffer with dyslexia, his comment; "it made absolutely no sense to me" Poor man he does have a problem.
Chuck accuses me of a 'rant' against Carolyn Elefant but he is 'ranting' so much you can see the steam coming out of his ears and the horns appearing out of his head. Ol' Chuck rants that I have a disagreement with an English lawyer but, just like Carolyn Elefant, he could not see the wood for the trees. Let me explain it for Chuck, Attorney Carolyn Elefant read an article in the Law Society Gazette and got her 'bits and bobs' all tangled up and made false outrageous accusations against me. Let me point out the 'wood' that Chuck cannot 'see', if Chuck had read the information right and looked at the links correctly he would have seen there was no 'English Lawyer' involved just the fact that his 'friend' had published false defamatory allegations against me and he couldn't, let me repeat "see the wood for the trees". So I suppose this is why "it made absolutely no sense" at all to Chuck and in the first instance it was an American Attorney with a big 'EGO' that stuck her big nose into my affairs, not the other way round
The first point I note from Chuck's response is that he said "I am not about to publish a comment concerning nasty little statements that are designed to achieve nothing else but to get a rise out of people". Funny that he seem to think his friend's erroneous allegations, lies, defamatory accusations of extortion published on the www are not "nasty little statements" but when I respond, after she has refused to remove them and apologise, he then thinks that what I say are "nasty little statements". Boy-O-Boy Chuck lad your brains must be down in your boots.
OK Chuck, from your perspective, please tell me how my disagreement with the English Law Society and their members has anything to do with your good friend's defamatory accusations of extortion on the www against me. The Law Society Gazette ran the story about Rick Kordowski but your friend put her own 'spin' on it then named the wrong website. When you actually got through to her addled brain, what was her excuse, "I was confused", she didn't even apologise and lied her socks off in trying to shift the blame in my direction. I don't suppose that is a good enough reason for me to have got annoyed about, what do you think Chuck??
Finally what did Chuck's friend say on her Blog after the "wood" became visible to her "I had made a mistake so I was loathe to apologize" add that to her overlarge 'EGO' we know why she could not apologise. Your relations are for life and not by choice your friends are. Advice to Chuck, have second thoughts on this one!