Press Complaints Commission 'if only'

The Deputy Prime Minister's, Nick Clegg, description of this 'fine upstanding body' : -
"The Press Complaints Commission is a 'busted flush' and 'needs to be replaced'.
A 'complaints body' at best run by the Newspapers for the Newspapers"
So meet the 'Barmy Army' the Commission Members.
2011
Meet Lt Gen Sir Michael Wilcocks, at the 'Last Chance Saloon'
.
The Guardian published, so called Journalist, Jon Robins' inacrate article accusing an innocent person of the crimes of another although in the eyes of Mr Justice Lloyd Jones the Guardian's Editor "was responsible for all postings...even if he was not the author".
.
Having been informed that an article published by the Guardian calling my "Website that has become the scourge of all lawyers, good and bad" which appeared to be confusing me with somebody else, I immediately sent an email to Jon Robins, the Journalist, and five other related mailboxes of which I receive just two automated replies.
jon@jures.co.uk; (Jon Robins) and cc'd to gus@jures.co.uk; (Gus Sellitto) letters@guardian.co.uk; letters@observer.co.uk; reader@guardian.co.uk ; info@jures.
.
Having received no response from the Guardian, their sister Newspaper, the Journalist, Jon Robins, or his company I repeat the process which, once again, only achieved automated replies.
reader@guardian.co.uk; letters@guardian.co.uk; and cc'd to jon@jures.co.uk; (Jon Robins) letters@observer.co.uk;
gus@jures.co.uk; (Gus Sellitto) info@jures.co.uk;
.
After six weeks and twelve emails I'm forced to contact the Press Complaints Commission which by this time (six weeks delay) the situation has spiralled out of control and the false actuations by the Guardian has spread worldwide.
.
I receive an email from Rebecca Hales, Complaints Officer at the Press Complaints Commission, acknowledging my Complaint against the Guardian Newspaper.
.
Email from Ms Hales saying "The Commission has now received a response to your complaint from the Guardian newspaper, a copy of which is attached". Ms Hales stated in her email "Do let me know whether the action taken by the Guardian represents an acceptable means of resolving your concerns". What she didn't say; 'Then the Guardian can walk away having sh*t on another idiot'..
Elisabeth Ribbans, Managing Editor at the Guardian, states in the attached email that they have no record of my first email but when she realises I have an automated reply she then comes up a few more excuses.
.
I reply to the above email saying: - "My dissatisfactions are many", which I list in depth.
.
Straight after sending Ms Hales the above email I receive one back saying; "However, before I revert to the newspaper, can you confirm if it is the case that you are still seeking the apology requested in your email of 30 March to Mr Robins? If so, would this take the form of a private or public apology?"
.
Either the PCC don't understand English or more than likely they don't want to so I repeated from my email of the 16th; "In section '4' of my response I believe I made it clear when I said "...I'm not prepared to accept an apology" and I have no intentions of offering the Guardian a second 'bite of the cherry'."

A bit of 'arm twisting' by Rebecca Hales to have me accept the Guardian's Editor and their Letter Reader's Bull Sh*t excuses
An email sent to the PCC from Elisabeth Ribbans, the Guardian's Managing Director, saying they "strive to act promptly as possible in dealing with significant complaints mistakes. ...this was simply human error..." 'mistakes' and 'human error', more like 'negligence' and 'incompetence'.
.
An email to Ms Hales again making it clear I want my complaint considered by the Complaints Commission.
.
An email from the Guardian via the PCC with excuses and an email they said they didn't receive on 30 March has now turned up.
.
an email from Rebeca Hales saying my complaint is being passed to the Complaints Commission.
.
26 May Thomas Boyd Whyte Solicitors of Bexleyheath, Kent 'Raise their Head'
. These 'Idiots' are so 'Confused' after reading an inaccurate, derogatory article 'penned' by Journalist
. Jon Robins based on an email he received from Desmond Hudson, Law Society's Chief Executive,
. and then published in the Guardian that they, Thomas Boyd Whyte, entered the 'Arena' waving the
. 'Big Stick' and making misguided threats of how they would be seeing me in the High Court with some
. other 1,000 defendants. What a 'Pathetic' idiotic lot they are!
The PCC make their Decision and call their new rule "Geuine Human Error", no it's not a 'Joke'.
.
I sent a letter of Appeal to Reviewer 'Lt Gen Sir Michael Wilcocks' (Sir Michael will now sit on his hands for over seven weeks is he, as an Ex Army Officer, and the Commission working on a 'Defence Strategy).
.
wrote a letter to 'Lt Gen Sir Michael Wilcocks' office c/o Tonia Milton, IR Administrator to say I intend referring my complaint to the Ombudsman.
..
I send my complaint to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman.
Complaint of Maladministration by the Press Complaints Commission.
..
'Oh Dear' the PO deals with 'Maladministration' but Lyndsey Carpenter, Customer Services Officer, tells me that the PCC does not come under their umbrella. Oh well if you are not on 'Footballers' salaries that's the end of the line for as the Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg has stated "The PCC is run by the Newspaper for the Newspaper".
.
The PO's Office say "...you will need to re-approach them..." So I will do as is suggusted plus I have sent them a copy of my letter to the PO's Office.
.
29 Sept Tonia Milton, IR Administrator, sends me a copy of Mick's letter that he supposedly wrote on the 10 August which it appears 'got lost in the post'. Believe that you will believe anything.
I have again wrote to Sir Mick but like the three Pakistan Cricketers that have been in the news of late with their 'No-ball' antics and have ended up in jail. So when Mick and the PCC are being bribed with large donations from the newspapers, the temptation to bowl 'No-balls' is too much to expect Mickey and the Barmy Army to resist..
.
21 Oct It appears Desmond Hudson, Law Society's chief executive, in a conversation/interview with Journalist, Jon Robins, made derogatory comments about my website; "However from all we have seen, what this website is about is simply a blanket characterisation of all legal professionals as corrupt, and providing a vehicle for pursuing personal grudges and vendettas". Today I have written to Des for his explanation..
.
Mickey the 'Puppet' sends me a letter via 'his girl Friday' which states "He considers the matter closed".
As I said above Mickey delivers a 'No-ball' once again..
.
Large Pockets Des, Law Society's chief executive, states he never spoke or was interviewed by Jon Robins only supplied a comment to a request!.
.
Wrote Desmond Hudson, Law Society's chief executive, asking for info of the request by Jon Robins and a copy of his comments.
.
A reply from Des via Joao Cutto, Information Compliance Officer, stating the Law Society are not covered by the
Freedom of Information Act but adopted their own voluntary Code of Practice which closely reflect the FOIA.
They will respond by the 14 December.
.
Des wrote telling me my complaint is with the news media. No Sir, it wasn't me it was that kid down the road, I saw him do it! . 'Pathetic'. Do these people have any 'Balls'?
.

I have written to Des telling him I don't agree with his finger-pointing at the news media. I quoted Justice Tugendhat to him
"you should take reasonable care in relation to the publication".
.
8 Dec .
Received on the
12 December
Des gives an opinion on behalf of the Law Society on the "Solicitors from Hell" website. Des was very careless in not
correctly naming which website he was referring to (Mr Vassall-Adams QC said in Court: - "... very serious defamatory
allegations without any prior check to establish their truth or accuracy"). 'Del Boy' sorry' Des, being on £400,000
(£8,000 per week) plus extras it would be expected he would not make 'disastrous' mistakes and when confronted by
the website owner the derogatory comment were made against would not expect him to give the 'one finger salute'.
.
15 Dec
Received on the
19 December
I have received a letter from Des that states; "Accordingly I consider our correspondence closed".
Thats Des's opinion not mine.
2012 . . . .
9 Jan
I sent a complaint to Adam Sampson, Chief Ombudsman, about Des Hudson, Law Society's Chief Executive.
Adam Sampson Office 'phoned me at 9.30am on 12 Jan telling me they only deal with 'inadequate' service of
Solicitors/law firms and I should contact the LS at Chancery Lane. Emailed LS at Chancery am on 12 Jan.
.
  Awaiting a response from Chancery Lane. . Back in November 2010 Des, LS Chief Exec, wrote to Christopher Graham
the Information Commissioner, to 'drum-up' support against the 'Solicitors from Hell' website the IC replied in January 2011
and it seems 'Des Boy' once again has 'shot himself in the foot'. - Read the Letter.